Product Engineer: что подтверждено данными, а что пока нет
Supported findings The evidence supports that AI adoption is widespread in the 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey: 84% of respondents were using or planning to use AI tools, and 51% of professional developers used AI tools daily.[1][2] The evidence also supports that trust is lower than usage: 46% of developers actively distrust AI tool accuracy, while 33% trust it, and only 3% report highly trusting the output.[1][2] The evidence supports that 64% of developers do not perceive AI as a threat to their jobs.[3] Blocked or unsupported claims The 52% AI-agents aggregation should not be presented as verified, because the gathered evidence does not establish that figure.[1][2][3] The product engineer compensation benchmark claim should not be presented as verified, because no supporting compensation evidence was gathered. The Russian IT market claim should not be presented as verified, because the gathered evidence does not include market data for that conclusion. Evidence caveat Evidence repair budget is exhausted, and the evidence remains insufficient to verify the unsupported claims. Any facts not directly supported by the gathered evidence must be labeled as unverified rather than asserted as true.[1][3] Recommended next-step framing Use only the passing claims in the summary: AI adoption is high, trust lags usage, and most developers do not see AI as a job threat.[1][3] Explicitly flag missing market or compensation evidence instead of filling gaps with assumptions. Keep unsupported figures and market statements clearly marked as unverified until corroborating evidence is available.